Muller Misled the Pugwash Conference on Radiation Risks

How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment

(2023) Paul B. Selby et al.   Science of The Total Environment

Cover up and cancer risk assessment: Prominent US scientists suppressed evidence to promote adoption of LNT

(2022) Edward J. Calabrese et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk assessment

(2022) Edward J. Calabrese   CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS

Linear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous toxicological stress tests: Implications for continued policy use

(2022) Edward J. Calabrese   CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS

Manhattan Project genetic studies: Flawed research discredits LNT recommendations

(2022) Edward J. Calabrese et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began

(2021) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 2: How unsound LNT science became accepted

(2021) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

The Selby-Russell Dispute Regarding the Nonreporting of Critical Data in the Mega-Mouse Experiments of Drs William and Liane Russell That Spanned Many Decades: What Happened, Current Status, and Some Ramifications

(2020) P. B. Selby   Dose-Response

The Muller-Neel dispute and the FATE of cancer risk assessment

(2020) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations

(2019) Edward J. Calabrese   CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS

EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives

(2019) Edward J. Calabrese   CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS

From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment

(2018) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

Flaws in the LNT single-hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment

(2017) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT

(2017) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate

(2017) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith

(2015) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose–response concept

(2013) Edward J. Calabrese   ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY

Key studies used to support cancer risk assessment questioned

(2011) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS

Toxicology rewrites its history and rethinks its future: Giving equal focus to both harmful and beneficial effects

(2011) Edward J. Calabrese   ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY

The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment

(2009) Edward J. Calabrese   ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY