4.7 Article

Systematic Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis Reveals Intersubcomplex Contacts in the Nuclear Pore Complex

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 2594-2606

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.054627

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. German Ministry of Science (NGFNp) [NeuroNet-TP3 01GS08171]
  3. German Ministry of Science (BMBF) [0315082]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01GM77537, T32GM007287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) enables transport across the nuclear envelope. It is one of the largest multiprotein assemblies in the cell, built from about 30 proteins called nucleoporins (Nups), organized into distinct subcomplexes. Structure determination of the NPC is a major research goal. The assembled similar to 40-112 MDa NPC can be visualized by cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET), while Nup subcomplexes are studied crystallographically. Docking the crystal structures into the cryo-ET maps is difficult because of limited resolution. Further, intersubcomplex contacts are not well characterized. Here, we systematically investigated direct interactions between Nups. In a comprehensive, structure-based, yeast two-hybrid interaction matrix screen, we mapped protein-protein interactions in yeast and human. Benchmarking against crystallographic and coaffinity purification data from the literature demonstrated the high coverage and accuracy of the data set. Novel intersubcomplex interactions were validated biophysically in microscale thermophoresis experiments and in intact cells through protein fragment complementation. These intersubcomplex interaction data provide direct experimental evidence toward possible structural arrangements of architectural elements within the assembled NPC, or they may point to assembly intermediates. Our data favors an assembly model in which major architectural elements of the NPC, notably the Y-complex, exist in different structural contexts within the scaffold.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available