4.6 Article

Evaluating the impact on physical inactivity of Together an Active Future, a partnership approach to physical activity promotion. A difference-in-differences study

Journal

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-220891

Keywords

INEQUALITIES; PUBLIC HEALTH; EXERCISE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the effectiveness of community-wide interventions to increase physical activity in disadvantaged areas in the UK. It suggests that a program of creative engagement, partnership building, training, and communication can help reduce physical inactivity. The study also found no significant differences in the effects of the intervention among different demographic groups. Further monitoring is needed to understand the impact of this intervention outside of the pandemic context.
BackgroundLow physical activity is one of the leading causes of ill health in the UK and an important determinant of health inequalities. Little is known about the effectiveness of community-wide interventions to increase physical activity and whether effects differ by demographic groups, including area deprivation and ethnicity.Setting6 relatively disadvantaged local authority areas in Lancashire, UK, between 2016 and 2021.MethodsWe conducted a doubly robust difference-in-differences study using a large nationally representative repeated cross-sectional survey to investigate the impact of Together an Active Future (TAAF), an intervention aiming to reduce physical inactivity through a programme of creative engagement, partnership building, training and communication. The primary outcome was physical inactivity (the percentage of the population engaging in less than 30 min physical activity of at least moderate intensity per week).ResultsWhile inactivity increased during the pandemic, it increased to a lesser extent in the intervention population. TAAF was associated with 2.63 percentage point lower level of physical inactivity (95% CI 0.80 to 4.45) in the intervention group relative to the control group. Subgroup analysis found no evidence of differences in effect between groups defined by deprivation, ethnicity, disability, gender or age.ConclusionsThe study suggests that a programme of creative engagement, partnership building, training and communication can help reduce physical inactivity, potentially mitigating some of the effect of pandemic restrictions. Further monitoring is required to understand the impact of this intervention outside of the pandemic context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available