4.0 Article

Heavy Loads and Lifting Are Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Injuries in Deployed Female Soldiers

Journal

MILITARY MEDICINE
Volume 181, Issue 11, Pages E1476-E1483

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00435

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Institute of Environmental Medicine under Task Area S
  2. U.S. Army Institute of Environmental Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to investigate physical, occupational, and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) in deployed female soldiers. Before deployment, participants completed performance testing and surveys and after deployment an additional survey detailing occupational demands and MSI. Data analyzed found 57/160 (36%) suffered 78 MSI. In unadjusted analyses, these factors increased the relative risk (RR, 95% confidence interval) of injury: wearing an average load > 10% body weight (BW) (RR = 2.00, 1.31-4.57), wearing an average load > 1 hour (RR = 2.44, 1.30-4.57), heaviest load worn > 15% BW (RR = 5.83, 1.51-22.50), wearing a backpack (RR = 1.82, 1.23-2.80), wearing body armor > 1 hour (RR = 1.62, 1.002-2.62), lifting objects weighing above 22.68 kg (RR = 1.96, 1.08-3.57), lifting objects one to two times (RR = 1.73, 1.002-2.97), carrying objects > 7.62 m (RR = 2.01, 1.19-3.42), and Y Balance composite score < 95.23 (RR = 1.71, 1.13-2.60). The best logistic regression model predicting MSI was average load as % BW (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 1.01-1.07), heaviest load as % BW (OR = 1.03, 1.01-1.05), average repetitions lifting objects (OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.14), and sit-ups (OR = 0.93, 0.93-0.99). Results indicate that risk of MSI in deployed female soldiers increased with heavier equipment worn and more repetitious lifting, although more performing more sit-ups on the fitness test before deployment reduced the risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available