Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad134
Keywords
Simulation studies; Monte Carlo; graphics for simulation; avoiding errors
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Simulation studies are important in epidemiology and biostatistics, but unexpected results can occur. To ensure quality, careful design and analysis with visual tools should be conducted to identify and address outliers and failed estimations.
Simulation studies are powerful tools in epidemiology and biostatistics, but they can be hard to conduct successfully. Sometimes unexpected results are obtained. We offer advice on how to check a simulation study when this occurs, and how to design and conduct the study to give results that are easier to check. Simulation studies should be designed to include some settings in which answers are already known. They should be coded in stages, with data-generating mechanisms checked before simulated data are analysed. Results should be explored carefully, with scatterplots of standard error estimates against point estimates surprisingly powerful tools. Failed estimation and outlying estimates should be identified and dealt with by changing data-generating mechanisms or coding realistic hybrid analysis procedures. Finally, we give a series of ideas that have been useful to us in the past for checking unexpected results. Following our advice may help to prevent errors and to improve the quality of published simulation studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available