4.7 Article

Integrating photochemical vapor generation with photo-oxidation trapping for effective mercury removal from polluted water and its on-line monitoring

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 98-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.06.014

Keywords

Mercury removal; Photochemical vapor generation; Photo-oxidation trapping; Atomic fluorescence spectrometry; On-line monitoring; Water

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21275103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new system was constructed and its performance evaluated for simultaneous mercury removal from water and on-line monitoring. The system consisted of a photochemical vapor generator (Photo-CVG, for mercury removal), a photo-oxidation trapping reactor (for collection of removed mercury) and a commercial atomic fluorescence spectrometer (AFS, for on-line monitoring). In the presence of organic acids, inorganic Hg(II) was converted by UV irradiation to mercury cold vapor in the Photo-CVG, which was then rapidly separated from the water sample in a gas liquid separator (GLS) and transported to the photo-oxidation trapping reactor by air or argon for collection of the removed mercury and subsequent on-line monitoring by AFS for early-warning of mercury vapor leak to the environment. The factors affecting the efficiencies of cold vapor generation, transport, collection and on-line monitoring were carefully investigated. Under the optimized conditions, a limit of detection of 0.003 mu g L-1 was obtained for the proposed system by using only formic acid. Meanwhile, both the efficiencies of mercury removal and collection can be even dose to 100% in the mercury concentration range of 2-100 mu g L-1. The proposed system provided a safe, green, complete, simple and fast yet inexpensive method for low concentration mercury removal and online monitoring. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available