4.3 Article

Controllable synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticles: effects of ammonia and tetraethyl orthosilicate concentration

Journal

MICRO & NANO LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 885-889

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/mnl.2016.0434

Keywords

silicon compounds; nanoparticles; nanofabrication; ammonia; organic compounds; particle size; controllable synthesis; ammonia-tetraethyl orthosilicate concentration effects; drug carriers; drug delivery systems; Stober method; dynamic light scattering; scanning electron microscopy; nanoparticle size; dispersion; SiO2; NH3

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21436007, 21476204]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ14B060002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SiO2 nanoparticles can be used as drug carriers in drug delivery systems, wherein the size of the nanoparticles plays a vital role in their distribution in vivo. SiO2 nanoparticles were synthesised using the Stober method and characterised by dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscopy. The effects of the ammonia concentration, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) concentration, water loading and alcohol type on the size and dispersion of the SiO2 nanoparticles were investigated. The results showed that the concentration of ammonia was the most important factor in dictating the size of the SiO2 nanoparticles. The size of the particles increased with increasing ammonia and TEOS concentrations. Increasing the water loading caused a reduction in the particle size but an increase in the dispersion. Both the particle size and dispersion increased with increasing alcohol carbon number. Linear relationships were observed between the SiO2 particle size and the concentrations of ammonia and TEOS, which could be used to control the size of SiO2 nanoparticles during synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available