4.0 Article

Development of a Quantitative Multiplex PCR to Detect Three Common Alpha Thalassemia Deletions

Journal

HEMOGLOBIN
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 163-166

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03630269.2023.2260744

Keywords

Alpha thalassemia; multiplex PCR; diagnosis; deletion mutation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alpha thalassemia is a common genetic disorder in the Middle East. This study developed a new PCR method to identify common deletions in the alpha-globin gene cluster. The results showed significant differences in peak height ratios for different genotypes, and the method can provide genotype information for alpha thalassemia.
Alpha thalassemia is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder with a high prevalence in the Middle East. The severe form of alpha-thalassemia is incompatible with life and can cause significant obstetric complications in the mother. Therefore, it is important to determine the genotype in parents who have a chance of having a fetus with one of the severe forms of this disease. A total of 112 samples that were previously analyzed for common alpha thalassemia mutations in Iran were used in this study. A new multiplex PCR including quantitative polymerase chain reaction to amplify the homologous regions of the alpha-globin gene cluster and fluorescent gap PCR was designed to identify -& alpha;3.7, -& alpha;4.2, --MED deletions. The ROC curve was used to determine the optimum cutoff points. Statistical analysis showed that there is a significant difference between the peak height ratios for different genotypes. The peak corresponding to the 297 bp fragment resulting from the amplification of the allele with MED-I deletion was detected in all the samples with this deletion. Different cutoffs for a range of sensitivities and specificities were determined by the ROC curve. The suggested method can identify three common large deletions in the alpha-globin gene cluster. A study with a larger sample size can provide more accurate information about the sensitivity and specificity of this test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available