4.0 Article

Two Novel α-Thalassemia Mutations CD 39-C [Thr > Pro] and CD 109 ACC > CCC [Thr > Pro] Identified in Two Chinese Families: A Case Report

Journal

HEMOGLOBIN
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 172-179

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03630269.2023.2263365

Keywords

Thalassemia; iron deficiency anemia; pregnancy; next-generation sequencing; HBA1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reported the identification and functional analysis of two rare alpha-thalassemia silent carriers with novel HBA1 mutations. The research highlighted the importance of gestational thalassemia screening and increased our understanding of the relationship between genotype and phenotype of alpha-thalassemia.
We reported the identification of two rare alpha-thalassemia silent carriers with novel HBA1 mutations of CD 39 -C [Thr > Pro] (HBA1: c.114del; p.Thr39Profs*11) and CD 109 ACC > CCC [Thr > Pro] (HBA1: c.325A > C; p. Thr109Pro), respectively. The two probands were pregnant women diagnosed with mild hypochromic anemia or microcytic hypochromic anemia by routine blood tests. They started iron therapy before taking differential diagnosis from iron deficiency anemia. After wait and watch approach, they both accepted thalassemia genetic screening, which identified CD 39 -C [Thr > Pro] and CD 109 ACC > CCC [Thr > Pro], respectively. Due to inappropriate iron therapy, worse anemia and iron overload were noticed in the first proband, but no obvious side effect was found in both probands. Functional analysis showed that, relative to the wild type, CD 39 -C [Thr > Pro] considerably reduced the expression of the HBA1 protein while CD 109 ACC > CCC [Thr > Pro] only had a minor impact. Our study highlighted the importance of gestational thalassemia screening based on next-generation sequencing for identifying novel rare thalassemia variants and increased our understanding about the relationship between genotype and phenotype of alpha-thalassemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available