4.6 Article

Numerical simulation of cold-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on 316L stainless steel

Journal

FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2023.104020

Keywords

Cold spray; Ceramic coatings; Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL); Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH); Modelling; Mechanical interlocking; Bonding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study numerically investigated the deposition behavior of cold-sprayed hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on a stainless steel substrate. The results showed that particle velocity and mechanical interlocking played an important role in bonding and retaining the HA coatings.
This study numerically investigates the deposition behavior of cold-sprayed hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on a 316L stainless steel substrate. The velocity of HA particles sprayed using a de Laval nozzle was estimated using the discrete phase mode (DPM) model in FLUENT. Particle retention was subsequently analyzed using the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) models. The critical or threshold particle velocity was determined to be 577 m/s. Higher particle retentions were observed for impacted velocities closer to this threshold. Various morphologies of the splat were observed depending on the impact velocity, ranging from cap-shaped to ring-like structures. At impact velocities exceeding 677 m/s, the central part of the splat detached due to high spring back force, leaving behind ring-like particle remnants on the substrate. Moreover, beyond this velocity, stripes surrounding the splat diameter and grooves around the cap were observed due to material fragmentation. The study emphasizes the significant role of particle velocity and mechanical interlocking in bonding and retaining HA coatings on the metal substrate, distinct from adiabatic shear instability prevalent in metal-on-metal coatings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available