4.0 Review

Hybrid wheat breeding using photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterility (PCMS) caused by Aegilops crassa cytoplasm

Journal

CYTOLOGIA
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages 197-202

Publisher

UNIV TOKYO CYTOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.88.197

Keywords

Aegilops crassa; Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS); Heterosis; Hybrid wheat; Photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterility (PCMS); Triticum aestivum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterility (PCMS) is proposed as a two-line system for hybrid wheat production in Japan. This system utilizes PCMS lines and a pollinator line to produce hybrid seeds under different photoperiod conditions.
Photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterility (PCMS) caused by Aegilops crassa cytoplasm under long-day (LD) photoperiods (>= 15 h) has been proposed as a two-line system for producing hybrid varieties of common wheat (Triticum aestivum). PCMS lines are maintained by self-pollination under short-day (SD) conditions (<15 h), while outcrossing PCMS plants to a T. aestivum pollinator line under LD conditions pro-duces hybrid seeds. In this system, it is not necessary to have maintainer lines in order to sustain the PCMS lines. Several promising elite PCMS lines with a Japanese wheat cultivar 'Fukuotome' genetic background have been developed; these lines show high cross-pollination fertility and high male sterility under LD conditions, and high seed fertility under SD conditions. In addition, the European wheat cultivar 'Fortunato' was found to be suitable for use in the PCMS system. Through the use of the PCMS elite lines and the selected pollinator line, F1 seeds have been produced under LD conditions in Hokkaido, Japan, and the agronomic characters of F1 hybrids have been examined under SD conditions in Fukui, Japan. The results indicate the practicality of using this PCMS system for hybrid wheat production in Japan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available