4.6 Article

Safety of the CO-Rebreathing Method in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 33-38

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000729

Keywords

HEMOGLOBIN MASS; RCM; CARDIAC FUNCTION; CVD; HEART DISEASE; VO2max

Categories

Funding

  1. regional health authorities in mid-Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To address and study the safety concerns with the improved carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing method for measuring total blood volume in patients with coronary artery disease to implement the use of the methodology in this patient group. Methods Eighteen patients with stable coronary artery disease (age 62 7 yr, 24 5 months since diagnosis) were investigated using the improved CO-rebreathing test. Before, during, and up to 2 h after the test, ECG, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, carbon monoxide bound to hemoglobin (HbCO%), and cardiac function were measured. At 24 h, HbCO% and troponin-T were measured. Design Cross-over Results Six minutes after the CO-rebreathing test, HbCO increased from 1.5% +/- 0.4% to 6.0% +/- 0.6%, with a subsequent decrease to 4.5% +/- 0.4% and 1.4% +/- 0.4% at 2 h and 24 h after the test, respectively. Resting heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction were 64 +/- 11 bpm, 93.9 +/- 16.5 mL per beat, 5.84 +/- 0.99 L, and 48.5% +/- 5.7% and remained unchanged during and 10 min after the rebreathing. All patients were in sinus rhythm during the 2-h observation period, without ST- or T-wave changes, with low numbers of premature beats and normal rate variability. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure gradually decreased during the observation period. Troponin-T was below the 99th percentile for all the participants 24 h after the test. Conclusion Cardiovascular function and safety indices remained unchanged after exposure to approximately 6% HbCO, indicating that the method is safe to perform in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available