4.2 Article

Online health information on sinonasal inverted papillomas: An assessment on readability and quality

Journal

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14115

Keywords

online information; quality; readability; Ringertz tumour; Schneiderian papilloma; sinonasal inverted papilloma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the readability and quality of online patient information on sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP), and found that the quality and comprehensibility of this information is below the expected standard.
Background/Objectives: Sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is a rare but serious diagnosis, with a paucity of patient-centred information regarding this condition. As more patients are seeking healthcare information online, the quality and comprehensibility of this information becomes ever more important. The aim of the study was to investigate the readability and quality of websites on inverted papilloma.Methods: The term IP and seven of its synonyms were inputted into the three of the most commonly used search engines in the English-speaking world (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The first 20 results returned for each search term were then screened with our exclusion criteria. The remaining websites were assessed for their readability using the using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and average grade level (AGL). Quality was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire.Results: Of the 480 websites returned using our search strategy, 410 were excluded using our screening criteria. Removal of duplicates from the remaining 70 websites left 14 for inclusion in the final analysis. The mean FRES score of the remaining websites was 30.5 +/- 10 and the mean AGL was 15.2 +/- 1.1, corresponding to a read-ing age of a 21-year-old. The median DISCERN score was 33.5 (30.5-36.5), a score which falls within the 'poor quality' range.Conclusion: The readability and quality of online patient information on IP is far below the expected standard. Healthcare providers have a responsibility to direct patients to appropriate sources of information or consider producing new material should a lack of appropriate sources exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available