The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Anthropocene is best understood as an ongoing, intensifying, diachronous event
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BOREAS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2023-10-10
DOI
10.1111/bor.12636
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The ‘Anthropocene’ is most useful as an informal concept
- (2023) Graeme T. Swindles et al. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
- Response to Waters et al. (2022) The Anthropocene is complex. Defining it is not
- (2023) Dorothy Merritts et al. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
- The Humanities are invited to the Anthropocene Event but not to the Anthropocene Series/Epoch: a response to Chvostek (2023)
- (2023) Stanley C. Finney et al. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
- The stratigraphic basis of the Anthropocene Event
- (2023) Matthew Edgeworth et al. Quaternary Science Advances
- The Anthropocene as an Event, not an Epoch
- (2022) Philip Gibbard et al. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
- Epochs, events and episodes: Marking the geological impact of humans
- (2022) Colin N. Waters et al. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
- The Anthropocene serves science better as an event, rather than an epoch
- (2022) Lucy E. Edwards et al. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
- The proposed Anthropocene Epoch/Series is underpinned by an extensive array of mid‐20 th century stratigraphic event signals
- (2022) Martin J. Head et al. JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
- A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event, not a formal epoch
- (2021) Philip L. Gibbard et al. EPISODES
- The chronostratigraphic method is unsuitable for determining the start of the Anthropocene
- (2019) Matt Edgeworth et al. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
- Three flaws in defining a formal ‘Anthropocene’
- (2018) William F. Ruddiman PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
- Timing and tempo of the Great Oxidation Event
- (2017) Ashley P. Gumsley et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene
- (2016) C. N. Waters et al. SCIENCE
- Comment on “When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary is stratigraphically optimal” by Jan Zalasiewicz et al. (2015), Quaternary International, 383, 196–203
- (2015) Mike Walker et al. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
- When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal
- (2015) Jan Zalasiewicz et al. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
- Defining the epoch we live in
- (2015) W. F. Ruddiman et al. SCIENCE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started