4.4 Article

Effect of Health Literacy on Decision-Making Preferences among Medically Underserved Patients

Journal

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 550-556

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16632197

Keywords

shared decision making; health literacy; medically underserved patients

Funding

  1. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation
  2. Siteman Cancer Center [P30 CA91842]
  3. Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM)
  4. WUSM Faculty Diversity Scholars Program
  5. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. Participation in the decision-making process and health literacy may both affect health outcomes; data on how these factors are related among diverse groups are limited. This study examined the relationship between health literacy and decision-making preferences in a medically underserved population. Methods. We analyzed a sample of 576 primary care patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the independent association of health literacy (measured by the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised) and patients' decision-making preferences (physician directed or patient involved), controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and gender. We tested whether having a regular doctor modified this association. Results. Adequate health literacy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; P = 0.009) was significantly associated with preferring patient-involved decision making, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and gender. Having a regular doctor did not modify this relationship. Males were significantly less likely to prefer patient-involved decision making (OR = 0.65; P = 0.024). Discussion. Findings suggest health literacy affects decision-making preferences in medically underserved patients. More research is needed on how factors, such as patient knowledge or confidence, may influence decision-making preferences, particularly for those with limited health literacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available