4.5 Article

Fluid-structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans

Journal

MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 1683-1694

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1458-0

Keywords

Aortic valve; Calcification; Stenosis; Fluid-structure interaction; Flow; Hemodynamics

Funding

  1. Nicholas and Elizabeth Slezak Super Center for Cardiac Research and Biomedical Engineering at Tel Aviv University,
  2. Seymour Pyper Research Fund at Sheba Medical Center
  3. National Institutes of Health: NIBIB Quantum Award: Implementation Phase II [U01 EB012487-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is characterized by calcification accumulation and thickening of the aortic valve cusps, leading to stenosis. The importance of fluid flow shear stress in the initiation and regulation of CAVD progression is well known and has been studied recently using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models. While cusp calcifications are three-dimensional (3D) masses, previously published FSI models have represented them as either stiffened or thickened two-dimensional (2D) cusps. This study investigates the hemodynamic effect of these calcifications employing FSI models using 3D patient-specific calcification masses. A new reverse calcification technique (RCT) is used for modeling different stages of calcification growth based on the spatial distribution of calcification density. The RCT is applied to generate the 3D calcification deposits reconstructed from a patient-specific CT scans. Our results showed that consideration of 3D calcification deposits led to both higher fluid shear stresses and unique fluid shear stress distribution on the aortic side of the cusps that may have an impact on the calcification growth rate. However, the flow did not seem to affect the geometry of the calcification during the growth phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available