No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry

Guidelines for a structured manuscript: Statistical methods and reporting in biomedical research journals

(2023) Robin Christensen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Revision risk by using the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty compared with postero-lateral approach: early nationwide results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)

(2023) Bart Van Dooren et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)

(2023) Liza N van Steenbergen et al.   Hip International

Linear mixed models to handle missing at random data in trial‐based economic evaluations

(2022) Andrea Gabrio et al.   HEALTH ECONOMICS

Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study

(2022) Eustathios Kenanidis et al.   Hip International

Direct superior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial on early outcomes on gait, risk of fall, clinical and self-reported measurements

(2021) Michele Ulivi et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty

(2021) Hollie J. Leonard et al.   Bone & Joint Journal

No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

(2020) Bouke J Duijnisveld et al.   Orthopaedic Surgery

The effect of surgical approach in total hip replacement on outcomes: an analysis of 723,904 elective operations from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man

(2020) Ashley W. Blom et al.   BMC Medicine

Direct superior approach with standard instrumentation for total hip arthroplasty: safety and efficacy in a prospective 200-case series

(2019) Eleftherios Tsiridis et al.   Hip International

The direct superior approach in total hip arthroplasty

(2019) Babar Kayani et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE

Similar Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches After Total Hip Arthroplasty

(2018) Rinne M. Peters et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty

(2018) Jonathan R. Danoff et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

Current Trends in Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Study of Four Major Orthopedic Journals

(2018) Matthew P. Siljander et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register

(2015) Liza N van Steenbergen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty

(2014) Einar Amlie et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively

(2013) Aksel Paulsen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Which Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Anterolateral or Posterior?

(2008) Jeya Palan et al.   CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH