4.7 Article

Selection of a chitosan gelatin-based edible coating for color preservation of beef in retail display

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 85-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.12.012

Keywords

Bioactive coating; Lipid oxidation; CIE color; Myoglobin-redox forms

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [CAG - PPM-00571-11]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [MCT 476355/2012-5]
  3. FAPEMIG
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan gelatin-based coating films were applied to beef steaks, and their effects on color preservation and lipid oxidation during retail display were evaluated. Response surface methodology was used to model and describe the effects of different biopolymer concentrations (0 to 6% gelatin; 0.5 to 1.5% chitosan; and 0 to 12% glycerol based on dry gelatin + chitosan weight) in the coating film for optimizing the best combination for meat application. Film application reduced weight loss and lipid oxidation of the steaks after 5 days of storage, and films with higher gelatin concentrations were more effective. The percentage levels of different myoglobinredox forms were not affected by coating, but myoglobin oxidation during retail display was reduced and the percentage of deoxymyoglobin increased with the gelatin content of the film. Steak color stability during retail display was promoted by film application; the steaks exhibited a darker, more intensely red color when coated in blends with higher gelatin and chitosan contents. Blends containing between 3% and 6% gelatin, between 0.5% and 1.0% chitosan and 6% glycerol exhibited the best results and provide a promising alternative to the preservation of beef in retail display. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available