4.7 Article

Spatial homogeneity of benthic macrofaunal biodiversity across small spatial scales

Journal

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 148-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.10.006

Keywords

Biodiversity; Macrobenthos; Seagrass; Spatial scale; Spatial homogeneity; Spatial uniformity; Species occupancy distributions

Funding

  1. Smuts Memorial Fund
  2. Rhodes University Research Committee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatial heterogeneity of biodiversity has been extensively researched, but its spatial homogeneity is virtually unstudied. An intertidal seagrass system at Knysna (South Africa) known to display spatially homogeneous macrobenthic species density at scales >= 0.0275 m(2) was re-investigated at four smaller spatial grains (0.0015 m(2) - 0.0095 m(2)) via a lattice of 8 x 8 stations within a 0.2 ha area. The aim was to investigate the null hypothesis that spatial homogeneity of species density is not a fixed emergent assemblage property but breaks down at small spatial grains within given spatial extents. Although assemblage abundance was significantly heterogeneous at all spatial grains investigated, both species density and functional-group density were significantly homogeneous across those same scales; observed densities not departing from those expected on the basis of independent assortment. Spatial homogeneity is therefore an emergent assemblage property within given spatial extents at Knysna and probably at equivalent sites elsewhere. Equivalent species density in South Africa, Australia and the UK at spatial grains <0.03 m(2), however, is a scale-related sampling artefact, as may be temporal homogeneity of species density at Knysna over a 3 year period, but close similarity in shape of their species occupancy distributions remains unexplained. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available