Contemporary agrarian, rural and rural-urban movements and alliances

Henry Bernstein has criticized the research agenda of the Emancipatory Rural Politics Initiative (ERPI), and the publications linked to it, for, among other things, not having specified which classes are supposed to comprise the proposed emancipatory rural politics. The Journal of Agrarian Change organized a special issue (published in January 2023) that takes Bernstein's critique as its point of departure. It emphasized the importance of movements of the working class that straddle the rural-urban corridor. I agree, but this should not be done by de-valuing the agrarian and the rural. The key challenge is in building agrarian, rural and rural-urban anti-capitalist movements and alliances within and between these spheres. This calls for more-not less-attention to agrarian movements seen from the inseparable domains of the agrarian, rural and rural-urban continuum in terms of academic research and political action. A starting point, and implication, of this broader unit of analysis and political intervention is an argument against a 'too agrarian-centric', or 'merely agrarian', mass movement-building and political mobilization to counter regressive populism and struggle against capitalism.

Automated summary

Henry Bernstein has criticized the Emancipatory Rural Politics Initiative (ERPI) and its publications for not specifying the classes supposed to comprise the proposed rural politics. A special issue of the Journal of Agrarian Change responds to this critique by emphasizing the importance of movements of the working class that span the rural-urban corridor. It argues for building anti-capitalist movements and alliances in the agrarian and rural sectors.