4.5 Article

High resolution MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes at 7 Tesla

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 1020-1028

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26498

Keywords

lymph nodes; pelvic imaging; ultrahigh field; MRI; lower abdomen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposePelvic lymph node (PLN) metastases are often smaller than 5mm and difficult to detect. This work presents a method to perform PLN imaging with ultrahigh-field MRI, using spectrally selective excitation to acquire water and lipid-selective imaging at high spatial resolution. MethodsA 3D water-selective multigradient echo (mGRE) sequence and lipid-selective gradient echo (GRE) sequence were tested in six healthy volunteers on a 7 Tesla (T) MRI system, using time interleaved acquisition of modes (TIAMO) to improve image homogeneity. The size distribution of the first 10 iliac PLNs detected in each volunteer was determined, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of these lymph nodes (LNs) was compared with the individual mGRE images, sum-of-squares echo addition, and computed T2*-weighted images derived from the T2* fits. ResultsLN imaging was acquired robustly at ultrahigh field with high resolution and homogeneous lipid or water-selective contrast. PLNs down to 1.5-mm short axis were detected with meanstandard error of the mean (SEM) short and long axes of 2.2 +/- 0.1 and 3.7 +/- 0.2mm, respectively. Computed T2*-weighted imaging allowed flexibility in T2* contrast while featuring a CNR up to 90% of the sum-of-squares echo addition. ConclusionUltrahigh-field MRI in combination with TIAMO and frequency-selective excitation enables high-resolution, large field-of-view MRI of the lower abdomen, and may ultimately be suitable for detecting small PLN metastases. Magn Reson Med 78:1020-1028, 2017. (c) 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available