4.2 Article

The local party voter: A localist anti-establishment voter?

Journal

ELECTORAL STUDIES
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102592

Keywords

Local parties; Local elections; Voting behavior; Anti-establishment; Municipalities; Political trust; Civil society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the distinct characteristics of voters who choose to vote for genuine local alternatives compared to other anti-establishment voters in Sweden. The findings show that these voters differ from both the Sweden Democrats' voters and voters for established parties, making them a distinct category of anti-establishment voters.
In several countries, local parties have increased their share of votes in local elections. This development has received limited scholarly attention compared to the immense interest paid to the fates of national level anti-establishment parties. Against this backdrop, we ask if something distinct characterizes those who choose to vote for genuinely local alternatives compared to other anti-establishment voters. Sweden is taken as the case in focus, a country where local parties have grown in numbers and strength throughout the past three decades. We view local parties as a part of a broader 'anti-establishment' family, and we explore if their voters a) are similar to those who vote for the most pronounced anti-establishment party in Sweden (Sweden Democrats), or b) if local party voters are a distinct anti-establishment category in their own right. Drawing on a survey data from 49 Swedish municipalities, we find that local party voters indeed distinguish themselves from both Sweden Dem-ocrat's voters and voters for the old and established parties, thus making them a distinct anti-establishment voter category of their own. These voters distrust their local politicians but at the same time are civically engaged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available