4.4 Article

Determination of the Wall Thickness of Block Copolymer Vesicles by Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 218, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201600454

Keywords

fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy; polymersomes; water transport

Funding

  1. EU [245500]
  2. European Research Council [279202]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [INST 221/87-1FUGG]
  4. University of Siegen
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [279202] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the characterization of reporter dye-loaded block copolymer vesicles (polymersomes) of PS115-b-PAA(15) (polystyrene-block-poly(acrylic acid)) and PEG(114)-b-PLA(167) (poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid)) and their drying behavior by fluorescence life-time imaging microscopy (FLIM). The characteristic changes of the fluorescence decay components of the dye calcein incorporated in the three different local nanoenvironments, namely, the solvated dye, dye associated with the vesicle wall, and dried agglomerated dye, are observed by FLIM during the drying of vesicles. The amplitude ratio R-1/2 of the components attributed to the solvated dye in the vesicle interior with a lifetime tau 1 approximate to 3.9 ns to the one attributed to calcein associated with the wall with a lifetime tau 2 approximate to 1.5 ns is found to decrease exponentially with drying time. The time constants, which are found to depend linearly on the radius of the vesicle, yield by extrapolation to zero vesicle diameter an estimate of the polymersome wall thickness. For PS115-b-PAA(15) and PEG(114)-b-PLA(167) vesicle wall thicknesses r(0) of 16 +/- 5 nm and 28 +/- 4 nm, respectively, are observed, which are in favorable agreement with transmission electron and atomic force microscopy data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available