4.7 Article

Combined effects of ultra-high hydrostatic pressure and mild heat on the inactivation of Bacillus subtilis

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 59-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.010

Keywords

Ultra-high hydrostatic pressure; Mild heat; Combined inactivation; Membrane permeability; FT-IR spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471696, 31071491]
  2. Twelfths 5-year National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2012BAD33B05]
  3. 863 project [2013AA102207]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effects of combined ultra-high hydrostatic pressure and mild heat (HPMH) treatments on the food-borne microorganism Bacillus subtilis were evaluated in this study. The B. subtilis culture (counted spores less than 2 log [CFU/mL]) was subjected to 100-500 MPa at 40 degrees C-60 degrees C for 15 min at pH 7.0. Treatment with HPMH increased membrane permeability by 10%-89% as determined by the uptake of propidium iodide. Changes in membrane lipids, proteins and DNA were detected in regions 3000 to 2800 cm(-1) and 1300 to 900 cm(-1) by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The membrane phospholipid molecules changed from a liquid crystalline state to a gel state, with a decrease in membrane fluidity. HPMH decreased the a-helix content (about 8-22%) while increased the random coil content (about 5-19%) of the cellular protein, which resulted in protein denaturation. Flow cytometry results indicated that HPMH treatment at 60 degrees C caused 63% damage to the esterase activity of the cells more than HPMH treatment at 40 degrees C. All of these results revealed the mechanism of HPMH, which is essential for the successful application of high hydrostatic pressure in neutral-pH food processing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available