4.5 Article

A phase II study of nintedanib in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 108-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.002

Keywords

Nintedanib; SCLC; VEGFR

Funding

  1. National Cancer Center [1410540]
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Nintedanib is an oral triple angiokinase inhibitor. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and methods: Pts with an ECOG PS from 0 to 2 who exhibited progression after one or two prior chemotherapy or chemo/radiotherapy were enrolled. Pts received nintedanib 200 mg BID daily in a 4-week cycle until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). A two-stage design was employed. To continue to stage 2, >= 2 responders out of 22 pts were required. Results: From Dec 2011 to June 2014, 24 pts were enrolled. Twenty-two pts completed treatment and were evaluable for response. The median follow-up was 9.7 (0.5-19.8) months. The median age was 64 (46-77) years. Twenty-two pts were male. Six pts had sensitive relapse. Eight pts received one prior chemotherapy. A median of one (range 1-5) cycle was administered. One pt had a partial response, and seven pts exhibited stable disease. The ORR was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-22.8). Median progression-free survival was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9-1.1) month, and overall survival was 9.8 (95% CI, 8.4-11.2) months. The response criteria to proceed to full accrual were not met. The most frequent drug-related adverse events (AE) included hepatic enzyme elevation (86%), anemia (73%), anorexia (59%), and nausea (50%). Most AEs were mild and manageable. Grade 3 hepatic enzyme elevation occurred in 5 pts (23%). Conclusions: Nintedanib exhibited only limited activity with a manageable AE profile in relapsed or refractory SCLC (NCT01441297). (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available