4.6 Article

Disc Diffusion and ComASP® Cefiderocol Microdilution Panel to Overcome the Challenge of Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratory Routine

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12030604

Keywords

cefiderocol resistance; disc diffusion; ComASP (R) cefiderocol; ID-CAMHB; susceptibility testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates. The results showed that disc diffusion and ComASP (R) microdilution panel can effectively determine the susceptibility of cefiderocol. The categorical agreement between the two methods was 94% and 84%, with only a few errors observed.
Cefiderocol susceptibility testing represents a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Although disc diffusion showed robustness to test cefiderocol susceptibility, large areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) are reported by current EUCAST breakpoints. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol on a collection of 286 difficult-to-treat Gram-negative isolates using disc diffusion and ComASP (R) cefiderocol microdilution panel. Broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted Mueller-Hinton broth was used as reference method. Following the EUCAST guidelines, disc diffusion allowed to determine cefiderocol susceptibility (susceptible or resistant) in 78.6%, 88.1%, 85.4% and 100% of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates tested, respectively. ComASP (R) cefiderocol panel showed 94% and 84% of overall categorical agreement and essential agreement. Only one very major error and two major errors were observed, for MIC values nearly close to the resistance breakpoint (2 mg/L). Overall, 20.5% of the carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales that achieved ATU results by the disc diffusion method tested resistant by both ComASP (R) panel and reference BMD. Conversely, all VIM-producing P. aeruginosa showed MIC values in the susceptible range (=2 mg/L). Lastly, only six out of seven (85.7%) A. baumannii isolates showing inhibition zones <17 mm tested resistant by both ComASP<(R)> panel and the reference BMD suggesting that inhibition zone <17 mm are not unequivocally suggestive of resistance. Our results, although obtained on a limited number of isolates, suggest that the combination of disc diffusion with a ComASP<(R)> cefiderocol microdilution panel could be a viable solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available