4.7 Article

Therapeutic evaluation of rutin in two-kidney one-clip model of renovascular hypertension in rat

Journal

LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 89-94

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.080

Keywords

Aliskiren; Goldblatt method; Reduced glutathione; Rutin; Thiobarbituric acid; Two-kidney one-clip

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The current investigation, designed to investigate the role of rutin in two-kidney one-clip (2K1C) induced renovascular dysfunction associated with hypertension in rat. Main methods: The renovascular hypertension was developed by the application of vascular clip on left renal artery in rats; the right kidney was kept as such throughout the experimental protocol. The rutin (200 and 300 mg/kg; p.o.) and aliskiren (50 mg/kg; p.o.) were administered for 9 consecutive days. The battery of pathophysiological tests i.e., systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and heart rate were performed to assess the anti-hypertensive effect of rutin. In addition, changes of kidney weight/body weight (KW/BW) ratio along with plasma renin content and renal tissue biomarkers i.e., thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBAR) and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were estimated. Key findings: The administration of rutin significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated the 2K1C of left kidney induced elevated systolic and diastolic pressure in a dose dependent manner. In addition, it also reduces the ratio of KW/BW along with a decrease in plasma renin content, tissue TBARS and increase the GSH levels. There were no significant changes observed in heart rate. Similar results were observed in aliskiren treated group. Significance: The anti-hypertensive effect of rutin may be a useful herbal medicine for the management of hypertension due to its potential free radical scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidation and plasma renin inhibitory action. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available