4.3 Article

Fast and accurate prediction of material properties with three-body tight-binding model for the periodic table

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.044603

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parametrized tight-binding models can efficiently and accurately predict properties of molecules and solids, but limited availability of well-tested parameter sets hinders routine use. To overcome this, a density functional theory database of nearly 1,000,000 materials is developed to fit a universal set of tight-binding parameters for 65 elements and their binary combinations, including two-body and three-body effective interaction terms. The model allows for metallic, covalent, and ionic bonds with the same parameter set and is continuously improved using a learning framework.
Parametrized tight-binding models fit to first-principles calculations can provide an efficient and accurate quantum mechanical method for predicting properties of molecules and solids. However, well-tested parameter sets are generally only available for a limited number of atom combinations, making routine use of this method difficult. Furthermore, many previous models consider only simple two-body interactions, which limits accuracy. To tackle these challenges, we develop a density functional theory database of nearly 1 000 000 materials, which we use to fit a universal set of tight-binding parameters for 65 elements and their binary combinations. We include both two-body and three-body effective interaction terms in our model, plus self-consistent charge transfer, enabling our model to work for metallic, covalent, and ionic bonds with the same parameter set. To ensure predictive power, we adopt a learning framework where we repeatedly test the model on new low-energy crystal structures and then add them to the fitting data set, iterating until predictions improve. We distribute the materials database and tools developed in this paper publicly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available