4.4 Article

High-resolution [O I] line spectral mapping of TW Hya supportive of a magnetothermal wind

Journal

NATURE ASTRONOMY
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 905-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-023-02004-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-unit spectroscopic explorer observations of TW Hya reveal that the [O I] emission from the inner 1 AU of the disk is likely due to a magnetothermal wind, questioning the role of photoevaporation in disk dispersal and impacting planet formation.
Multi-unit spectroscopic explorer observations of TW Hya trace the [O I] emission from the inner 1 au of the disk, arising from what is ostensibly a magnetothermal wind. This result questions the strength of the role of photoevaporation in disk dispersal and has implications for planet formation. Disk winds are thought to play a critical role in the evolution and dispersal of protoplanetary disks. A primary diagnostic of this physics is emission from the wind, especially in the low-velocity component of the [O I] lambda 6,300 line. However, the interpretation of the line is usually based on spectroscopy alone, which leads to confusion between magnetohydrodynamic winds and photoevaporative winds. Here we report that in high-resolution spectral mapping of TW Hya by the multi-unit spectroscopic explorer at the Very Large Telescope, 80% of the [O I] emission is confined to within 1 au radially from the star. A generic model of a magnetothermal wind produces [O I] emission at the base of the wind that broadly matches the flux and the observed spatial and spectral profiles. The emission at large radii is much fainter than predicted from models of photoevaporation, perhaps because the magnetothermal wind partially shields the outer disk from energetic radiation from the central star. This result calls into question the previously assessed importance of photoevaporation in disk dispersal predicted by models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available