Comparative efficacy of therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparative efficacy of therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Becaris Publishing Limited
Online
2023-06-02
DOI
10.57264/cer-2023-0016
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Ublituximab versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
- (2022) Lawrence Steinman et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Ponesimod Compared With Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in the Active-Comparator Phase 3 OPTIMUM Study
- (2021) Ludwig Kappos et al. JAMA Neurology
- Disease modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
- (2021) Zhuoyi Liu et al. AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
- Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review
- (2020) Stephen L. Hauser et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis
- (2020) Stephen L. Hauser et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Comparison of ofatumumab and other disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis
- (2020) Imtiaz A Samjoo et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- (2019) Huihui Li et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing ocrelizumab with other treatments for relapsing multiple sclerosis
- (2019) Rachael McCool et al. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
- Safety and efficacy of ozanimod versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RADIANCE): a multicentre, randomised, 24-month, phase 3 trial
- (2019) Jeffrey A Cohen et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Safety and efficacy of ozanimod versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (SUNBEAM): a multicentre, randomised, minimum 12-month, phase 3 trial
- (2019) Giancarlo Comi et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
- (2018) Rosa C. Lucchetta et al. CNS DRUGS
- Incorporating Genuine Prior Information about Between-Study Heterogeneity in Random Effects Pairwise and Network Meta-analyses
- (2018) Shijie Ren et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- A simple method for combining binomial counts or proportions with hazard ratios for evidence synthesis of time-to-event data
- (2018) Claire Watkins et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Multiple sclerosis
- (2018) Massimo Filippi et al. Nature Reviews Disease Primers
- Efficacy of fingolimod and interferon beta-1b on cognitive, MRI, and clinical outcomes in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: an 18-month, open-label, rater-blinded, randomised, multicentre study (the GOLDEN study)
- (2017) Giancarlo Comi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
- New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe
- (2017) Gisela Kobelt et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe
- (2017) Gisela Kobelt et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Comparative efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
- (2016) Emer Fogarty et al. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
- Pegylated interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (ADVANCE): a randomised, phase 3, double-blind study
- (2014) Peter A Calabresi et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions
- (2014) F. D. Lublin et al. NEUROLOGY
- Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis
- (2014) Rebecca M. Turner et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers
- (2013) Jeroen P Jansen et al. BMC Medicine
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3
- (2013) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4
- (2013) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Teriflunomide versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial
- (2013) Patrick Vermersch et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2
- (2012) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
- (2012) Georgia Salanti Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
- (2011) David C. Hoaglin et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
- (2010) Georgia Salanti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Multiple sclerosis
- (2008) Alastair Compston et al. LANCET
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started