4.6 Article

Comparison Between Terminal or Preterminal Conditioning of Donor Livers by Ex Situ Machine Perfusion

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 1286-1290

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004568

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, rat livers were subjected to normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then evaluated either directly or after a period of cold storage. Results showed that reperfusion outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups, indicating that performing NMP at regional perfusion centers could be a safe and cost-effective alternative.
Background.The successful implementation of end-ischemic normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) into clinical practice comes along with unusual demands for trained personnel and technical facilities in the implantation clinic. This creates an interest to bundle expertise and professional equipment for execution of MP at regional pump centers at the disadvantage of adding a second short period of cold preservation while sending the reconditioned grafts to the actual implant clinic. Differences of liver recovery upon reperfusion either immediately after NMP or after 3 h of cold storage subsequent to NMP should therefore be evaluated. Methods.Rat livers were cold stored for 18 h, subjected to 2 h of NMP, and then either directly evaluated by ex vivo reperfusion or exposed to a second cold storage period of 3 h to simulate transport from the hub center to the implant clinic. Livers stored for 18 h by cold storage only served as controls. Results.Both MP regimens significantly reduced hepatic enzyme release and improved bile production, clearance of lactate, and energetic recovery compared with the controls. However, no differences were seen between the 2 MP groups. Conclusions.The study provides first evidence that machine perfusion at regional perfusion centers may be a safe and economical alternative to the widespread individual efforts in the respective implantation clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available