4.3 Article

The effect of urethane and MS-222 anesthesia on the electric organ discharge of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01606-6

Keywords

Apteronotus leptorhynchus; Electric organ discharge; Immersion anesthesia; MS-222; Pacemaker nucleus; Urethane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urethane and MS-222, widely used anesthetic agents, have been found to significantly decrease the EOD frequency and increase the generation of transient modulations in neural activity of the central nervous system. This study emphasizes the need for caution when conducting neurophysiological experiments under general anesthesia and interpreting their results.
Urethane and MS-222 are agents widely employed for general anesthesia, yet, besides inducing a state of unconsciousness, little is known about their neurophysiological effects. To investigate these effects, we developed an in vivo assay using the electric organ discharge (EOD) of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus as a proxy for the neural output of the pacemaker nucleus. The oscillatory neural activity of this brainstem nucleus drives the fish's EOD in a one-to-one fashion. Anesthesia induced by urethane or MS-222 resulted in pronounced decreases of the EOD frequency, which lasted for up to 3 h. In addition, each of the two agents caused a manifold increase in the generation of transient modulations of the EOD known as chirps. The reduction in EOD frequency can be explained by the modulatory effect of urethane on neurotransmission, and by the blocking of voltage-gated sodium channels by MS-222, both within the circuitry controlling the neural oscillations of the pacemaker nucleus. The present study demonstrates a marked effect of urethane and MS-222 on neural activity within the central nervous system and on the associated animal's behavior. This calls for caution when conducting neurophysiological experiments under general anesthesia and interpreting their results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available