4.7 Article

Comparative study of naphthalene adsorption on activated carbon prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis from different typical coals in Xinjiang

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.09.001

Keywords

Microwave radiation; Activated carbons; Adsorption; Naphthalene

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51262025]
  2. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Xinjiang Bingtuan [2013BC002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coal-based activated carbons (CACs) prepared from anthracite (A) coal, bituminous (B) coal, and long flame (L) coal (i.e., ACAC, BCAC, and LCAC) from Xinjiang, China, using KOH as activating reagent, were investigated under various microwave radiation power levels. The results show that the adsorption capacity of the obtained activated carbons (prepared under the optimum power level) toward naphthalene follows the order: ACAC > BCAC > LCAC. In addition, the textural properties of the CACs were investigated by means of SEM and low-temperature N-2 adsorption. The surface chemistry features of the CACs were investigated by XPS, FTIR spectroscopy and Boehm's titration method. ACAC has a higher surface area, pore volume, and zero point charge (pH(pzq) than the BCAC and LCAC, while acidic oxygen functional group of the ACAC is lower than that of BCAC and LCAC. In addition, the adsorption of naphthalene from the aqueous solution on the CACs could be favorably described by the Freundlich isotherm. The adsorption kinetics fits very well to the pseudo-second-order model. Among the three coals, A-coal was the best material having low ash content and less than 10% volatile content, which is beneficial for the preparation of CAC using microwave-assisted synthesis for naphthalene adsorption. (C) 2015 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available