4.7 Article

Virgin olive oil quality of hedgerow 'Arbequina' olive trees under deficit irrigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 1018-1026

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7828

Keywords

acidity; natural antioxidants; oxidative alterations; sensory quality; stability; super-high density

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2009-11310/AGR]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [AGR-6456-2010]
  3. FEDER programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) is used in hedgerow olive orchards to achieve a sustainable balance between water savings, tree vigor and oil production. Its effects on the presence of compounds responsible for the taste of the oil and its nutritional value are controversial. The present 3-year study was conducted in an 'Arbequina' orchard ( 1667 trees ha(-1)) under a full irrigation (FI) treatment (470.1mm year(-1) of water) and two RDI treatments scaled to replace 60% and 30%, respectively, of FI. The quality parameters, antioxidant contents and volatiles of the extracted virgin olive oil (VOO) were analyzed. RESULTS: In general, oils from the 30% RDI treatment had higher contents of pigments and phenolic compounds, a higher oleic/linoleic ratio and the highest oxidative stability, despite their lower tocopherol content. FIoils showed higher (E)-2-hexenal, 1-penten-3-one, ocimene, E-2-pentenal and pentene dimer contents than 30RDI oils, but lower contents of (E)-2-pentenol and volatile esters. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that a RDI strategy supplying 30% of the total irrigation needs induces an increase in natural antioxidants in VOO. Neither yield, nor the rest of the quality parameters were affected by the reduced irrigation. However, abundant autumn precipitation can over-ride these effects of 30% RDI treatment on oil quality. (C) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available