4.5 Article

Activation of E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP2 by non-receptor tyrosine kinase ACK1

Journal

IUBMB LIFE
Volume 75, Issue 7, Pages 595-608

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/iub.2705

Keywords

ACK1; autoubiquitination; EGF signaling; tyrosine phosphorylation; WWP2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WWP2, a member of the NEDD4 E3 ubiquitin ligase family, is regulated by auto-inhibition of its 2, 3-linker. Non-receptor tyrosine kinase ACK1 binds to WWP2 and phosphorylates it, partially activating WWP2's ligase activity. EGF stimulates ACK1-mediated phosphorylation of WWP2, suggesting a role for WWP2 in EGFR signaling in lung cancer.
WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 (WWP2) is a member of the NEDD4 E3 ubiquitin ligase family. WWP2 ligase activity is regulated by the 2, 3-linker auto-inhibition. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the 2, 3-linker was identified as an activating means for releasing the auto-inhibition of WWP2. However, the tyrosine kinase (TK) for the phosphorylation and activation remains unknown. In this report, we have found that non-receptor TK ACK1 binds to the WW3 domain of WWP2 and phosphorylates WWP2. ACK1 phosphorylates WWP2 at the 2, 3-linker and partially activates the ubiquitination ligase activity. Unexpectedly, tyrosine phosphorylation of the 2, 3-linker seems not a major mode for activation of WWP2, as ACK1 causes much higher activation of the 2, 3-linker tyrosine phosphorylation defective mutants of WWP2 than that of wild-type WWP2. Furthermore, epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of WWP2 and this EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of WWP2 is mediated by ACK1. Finally, knockdown of WWP2 by shWWP2 inhibits the EGF-dependent cell proliferation of lung cancer A549 cells, suggesting that WWP2 may function in the EGFR signaling in lung cancer progression. Taken together, our findings have revealed a novel mechanism underlying activation of WWP2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available