Comparison of three AUC techniques for the determination of the loading status and capsid titer of AAVs

Due to the rise of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) as gene therapy delivery vectors, boundary sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (boundary SV-AUC) has been developed into a widely used quality control assay even for release analytics. It can be considered as the gold standard for the determination of the loading status of empty, partially filled, and full capsids especially when conducted in multiwavelength (MWL) mode. It can be considered to provide the most accurate determination of the loading status, and it also provides information on the capsid titer, aggregates, and potential contaminants such as free DNA. MWL boundary SV-AUC can be regarded as a multi-attribute (MAM) method for the characterization of AAVs. One major drawback of the method is the high sample consumption both in terms of concentration and volume. Here, we compare two alternative AUC techniques, band SV-AUC and analytical CsCl density gradient sedimentation equilibrium AUC (CsCl SE-AUC) with the boundary SV-AUC and the MWL-SV-AUC experiment. Our data show a high consistency of the determined full/empty ratios between these techniques if the appropriate wavelengths and extinction coefficients are used.

Automated summary

Due to the rise of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) as gene therapy delivery vectors, boundary sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation (boundary SV-AUC) has become a widely used quality control assay for determining the loading status and characterizing AAVs. One drawback of this method is its high sample consumption. Here, we compare two alternative AUC techniques, band SV-AUC and analytical CsCl density gradient sedimentation equilibrium AUC (CsCl SE-AUC) with the boundary SV-AUC and the MWL-SV-AUC experiment, and find that they produce consistent results when appropriate parameters are used.