4.4 Article

Distinct Impacts of Aerosols on an Evolving Continental Cloud Complex during the RACORO Field Campaign

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Volume 73, Issue 9, Pages 3681-3700

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0361.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE's Earth System Modeling (ESM) Program via the FASTER project [DOE-DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  2. NASA [ROSES14-ACMAP, 105357-281945.02.31.03.24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A continental cloud complex, consisting of shallow cumuli, a deep convective cloud (DCC), and stratus, is simulated by a cloud-resolving Weather Research and Forecasting Model to investigate the aerosol micro physical effect (AME) and aerosol radiative effect (ARE) on the various cloud regimes and their transitions during the Department of Energy Routine Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Aerial Facility Clouds with Low Optical Water Depths Optical Radiative Observations (RACORO) campaign. Under an elevated aerosol loading with AME only, a reduced cloudiness for the shallow cumuli and stratus resulted from more droplet evaporation competing with suppressed precipitation, but an enhanced cloudiness for the DCC is attributed to more condensation. With the inclusion of ARE, the shallow cumuli are suppressed owing to the thermodynamic effects of light-absorbing aerosols. The responses of DCC and stratus to aerosols are monotonic with AME only but nonmonotonic with both AME and ARE. The DCC is invigorated because of favorable convection and moisture conditions at night induced by daytime ARE, via the so-called aerosol-enhanced conditional instability mechanism. The results reveal that the overall aerosol effects on the cloud complex are distinct from the individual cloud types, highlighting that the aerosol cloud interactions for diverse cloud regimes and their transitions need to be evaluated to assess the regional and global climatic impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available