4.7 Article

Enhanced effect and mechanism of colloidal nano-SiO2 modified rubber concrete

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 378, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131203

Keywords

Rubber concrete; Interfacial transition zone; Colloidalnano-SiO2; Strength; Microstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By adding highly dispersible colloidal nano-SiO2 (CNS) as an admixture, the strength and applicability of rubber concrete can be enhanced. The results show that the addition of CNS reduces the width of microcracks in rubber concrete and increases the early compressive strength by 30.3%.
With the addition of rubber particles, the intensity of concrete reduces, limiting the application of rubber concrete in engineering. To increase the strength and applicability of rubber concrete, a highly dispersible colloidal nano-SiO2 (CNS) is used as an admixture. This study analyzes the enhanced effects and mechanisms of CNS on rubber concrete. The microcracks measurement results indicated that the width of the microcracks in the CNSmodified rubber concrete ranges within 3-10 & mu;m, whereas that in ordinary rubber concrete ranges within 35-45 & mu;m. The gray value correction method of the energy dispersive spectrometer map quantified the element distribution of the rubber-cement interfacial transition zone (ITZ). The results show that, compared with rubber concrete, the length of the growth segment with element distribution in the CNS-modified rubber-cement ITZ decreased by more than 40%. Additionally, the highest relative enhancements (30.3%) in early rubber concrete compressive strength were achieved by adding CNS. These findings indicate that the enhancement mechanism of CNS to rubber concrete can be attributed to the interfacial microstructure modification caused by the surface effect of nano-SiO2 and filling effect of the nanoparticles in the ITZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available