4.6 Article

Slow Gait Speed and Risk of Mortality or Hospital Readmission After Myocardial Infarction in the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Disparities in Recovery from Acute Myocardial Infarction: Patients' Health Status Registry

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 596-601

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14016

Keywords

coronary artery disease; older adults; frailty; outcomes

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHBLI) [P50 HL077113]
  2. National Institute of Aging (NIA) [R03AG045067]
  3. T. Franklin Williams Scholarship Award
  4. Atlantic Philanthropies, Inc.
  5. John A. Hartford Foundation
  6. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine-Association of Specialty Professors, American College of Cardiology
  7. NHLBI [K23 HL116799]
  8. NIA [K07AG043587]
  9. (Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research at Yale University) from the NHLBI [U01 HL105270-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo determine the prognostic value of slow gait in predicting outcomes 1 year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DesignObservational cohort with longitudinal follow-up. SettingTwenty-four U.S. hospitals participating in the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in recovery from acute Myocardial infarction: Patients' Health status Registry. ParticipantsOlder adults (65) with in-home gait assessment 1 month after AMI (N = 338). MeasurementsBaseline characteristics and 1-year mortality or hospital readmission adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression in older adults with slow (<0.8 m/s) versus preserved (0.8 m/s) gait speed. ResultsSlow gait was present in 181 participants (53.6%). Those with slow gait were older, more likely to be female and nonwhite, and had a higher prevalence of heart failure and diabetes mellitus. They were also more likely to die or be readmitted to the hospital within 1 year than those with preserved gait (35.4% vs 18.5%, log-rank P = .006). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and race (slow vs preserved gait hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08-2.87, P = .02) but was no longer significant after adding clinical factors (HR = 1.23, 95% CI=0.74-2.04, P = .43). ConclusionSlow gait, a marker of frailty, is common 1 month after AMI in older adults and is associated with nearly twice the risk of dying or hospital readmission at 1 year. Understanding its prognostic importance independent of comorbidities and whether routine testing of gait speed can improve care requires further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available