4.7 Article

Differential responses of contrasting low phosphorus tolerant cotton genotypes under low phosphorus and drought stress

Journal

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04171-5

Keywords

Cotton; Phosphorus; Drought stress; Photosynthesis; Antioxidant system; osmotic adjustment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the tolerance to drought stress in two contrasting low P-tolerant cotton genotypes (Jimian169 and DES926). The results showed that Jimian169 can tolerate drought conditions through high photosynthesis, antioxidant capacity, and osmotic adjustment.
BackgroundDrought is one of the main reasons for low phosphorus (P) solubility and availability.AimsThe use of low P tolerant cotton genotypes might be a possible option to grow in drought conditions.MethodsThis study investigates the tolerance to drought stress in contrasting low P-tolerant cotton genotypes (Jimian169; strong tolerant to low P and DES926; weak tolerant to low P). In hydroponic culture, the drought was artificially induced with 10% PEG in both cotton genotypes followed by low (0.01 mM KH2PO4) and normal (1 mM KH2PO4) P application.ResultsThe results showed that under low P, PEG-induced drought greatly inhibited growth, dry matter production, photosynthesis, P use efficiency, and led to oxidative stress from excessive malondialdehyde (MDA) and higher accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and these effects were more in DES926 than Jimian169. Moreover, Jimian169 alleviated oxidative damage by improving the antioxidant system, photosynthetic activities, and an increase in the levels of osmoprotectants like free amino acids, total soluble proteins, total soluble sugars, and proline.ConclusionsThe present study suggests that the low P-tolerant cotton genotype can tolerate drought conditions through high photosynthesis, antioxidant capacity, and osmotic adjustment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available