4.3 Article

A Novel Baseline Removal Paradigm for Subject-Independent Features in Emotion Classification Using EEG

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010054

Keywords

EEG; inverse filtering; baseline removal; emotion classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emotion classification using EEG has become an important aspect of affective computing. This paper proposes a novel InvBase method for removing baseline power before extracting invariant features for emotion classification. It outperforms existing methods in terms of classification accuracy. The InvBase method combined with multilayer perceptron shows significant improvement over no-baseline-correction and subtractive methods.
Emotion plays a vital role in understanding the affective state of mind of an individual. In recent years, emotion classification using electroencephalogram (EEG) has emerged as a key element of affective computing. Many researchers have prepared datasets, such as DEAP and SEED, containing EEG signals captured by the elicitation of emotion using audio-visual stimuli, and many studies have been conducted to classify emotions using these datasets. However, baseline power removal is still considered one of the trivial aspects of preprocessing in feature extraction. The most common technique that prevails is subtracting the baseline power from the trial EEG power. In this paper, a novel method called InvBase method is proposed for removing baseline power before extracting features that remain invariant irrespective of the subject. The features extracted from the baseline removed EEG data are then used for classification of two classes of emotion, i.e., valence and arousal. The proposed scheme is compared with subtractive and no-baseline-correction methods. In terms of classification accuracy, it outperforms the existing state-of-art methods in both valence and arousal classification. The InvBase method plus multilayer perceptron shows an improvement of 29% over the no-baseline-correction method and 15% over the subtractive method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available