The hierarchy of voice framework: The dynamic relationship between employee voice and social hierarchy
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The hierarchy of voice framework: The dynamic relationship between employee voice and social hierarchy
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research in Organizational Behavior
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 100179
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2023-01-03
DOI
10.1016/j.riob.2022.100179
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Upward Mobility, the Cleft Habitus, and Speaking Up: How Class Transitions Relate to Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Voice
- (2022) Sean R. Martin et al. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
- Beyond cheap talk accounts: A theory of politeness in negotiations
- (2022) Alice J. Lee et al. Research in Organizational Behavior
- How and when managers reward employees’ voice: The role of proactivity attributions.
- (2022) Hyunsun Park et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
- Employee Constructive Voice: An Integrative Review and a Dyadic Approach
- (2022) You Jin Kim et al. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
- When and why does voice sustain or stop? The roles of leader behaviours, power differential perception and psychological safety
- (2022) Xin Liu et al. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE
- Employee Voice and Silence: Taking Stock a Decade Later
- (2022) Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
- “Doctor, please”: Educating Nurses to Speak Up With Interactive Digital Simulation Tablets
- (2021) Marie-Stéphanie Bracq et al. Clinical Simulation in Nursing
- How employees’ voice helps teams remain resilient in the face of exogenous change.
- (2021) Alex Ning Li et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
- Amplifying Voice in Organizations
- (2021) Kristin Bain et al. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
- Transformational Leadership and Voice: When Does Felt Obligation to the Leader Matter?
- (2021) Jinyun Duan et al. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY
- Can we talk? Why employees fail to report negative events to their managers
- (2021) Alex J. Scrimpshire et al. Career Development International
- The positive and negative effects of social status on ratings of voice behavior: A test of opposing structural and psychological pathways.
- (2021) Sijun Kim et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
- Stronger together: Understanding when and why group ethical voice inhibits group abusive supervision
- (2021) Mayowa T. Babalola et al. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
- I am not proactive but I want to speak up: A self-concept perspective
- (2021) Xiaohong Xiao et al. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
- Employee voice, psychologisation and human resource management (HRM)
- (2021) Michael Barry et al. Human Resource Management Journal
- Which Ideas for Change Are Endorsed? How Agentic and Communal Voice Affects Endorsement Differently for Men and for Women
- (2021) Elizabeth J. McClean et al. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
- Keeping it between us: Managerial endorsement of public versus private voice.
- (2020) Sofya Isaakyan et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
- Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal
- (2017) Xiaoyan Su et al. Sustainability
- Speak up! Barriers to challenging erroneous decisions of seniors in anaesthesia
- (2016) T. Beament et al. ANAESTHESIA
- Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
- (2015) Cameron Anderson et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor.
- (2012) Michael W. Kraus et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started