Comparison of tumor response assessment methods in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after locoregional therapy
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of tumor response assessment methods in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after locoregional therapy
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 443-448
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-04-10
DOI
10.1002/jso.24141
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Early survival prediction after intra-arterial therapies: a 3D quantitative MRI assessment of tumour response after TACE or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver
- (2015) Julius Chapiro et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Comparison of RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Pooled Analysis
- (2015) Jung Han Kim et al. Journal of Cancer
- Comparison of RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 on Computed Tomography in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- (2014) H.J. Jang et al. ONCOLOGY
- Radiological assessment of response to neoadjuvant transcatheter hepatic therapy with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI®) for colorectal liver metastases does not predict tumour destruction or long-term outcome
- (2013) R.P. Jones et al. EJSO
- Comparison of the methods for tumor response assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
- (2013) Eun Suk Jung et al. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
- Assessment of Chemotherapy Response in Colorectal Liver Metastases in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection and the Correlation to Pathologic Residual Viable Tumor
- (2013) Michael E. Egger et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- mRECIST and EASL responses at early time point by contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI predict survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by doxorubicin drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB TACE)
- (2012) H. J. Prajapati et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Why RECIST Works and Why It Should Stay--Reply to Counterpoint
- (2012) M. R. Sharma et al. CANCER RESEARCH
- RECIST: No Longer the Sharpest Tool in the Oncology Clinical Trials Toolbox--Point
- (2012) M. R. Sharma et al. CANCER RESEARCH
- Prospective comparison of prognostic values of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours with European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolisation
- (2012) Beom Kyung Kim et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Radiographic Response to Locoregional Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Predicts Patient Survival Times
- (2011) Khairuddin Memon et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- EASL and mRECIST responses are independent prognostic factors for survival in hepatocellular cancer patients treated with transarterial embolization
- (2011) Roopinder Gillmore et al. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
- Which Response Criteria Best Help Predict Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Chemoembolization? A Validation Study of Old and New Models
- (2011) Ju Hyun Shim et al. RADIOLOGY
- Hepatic Intra-Arterial Injection of Drug-Eluting Bead, Irinotecan (DEBIRI) in Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Refractory to Systemic Chemotherapy: Results of Multi-Institutional Study
- (2010) Robert C. G. Martin et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma
- (2009) Alejandro Forner et al. CANCER
- Is Selective Internal Radioembolization Safe and Effective for Patients with Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Venous Thrombosis?
- (2009) Charles E. Woodall et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now