4.5 Article

Joint frequency scaling of processor and DRAM

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 1549-1569

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-016-1680-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under the AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0476]
  2. National Science Foundation [0904782, 1047772, 1516096]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, through the Ames Laboratory [DE-AC02-07CH11358]
  4. US Department of Defense High Performance Computing Modernization Program through a HASI grant
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [0904782] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  8. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1516096, 1047772] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy efficiency and energy-proportional computing have become a central focus in modern supercomputers. Many previous energy-saving strategies have focused solely on the CPU while the DRAM subsystem has not been addressed sufficiently, even though memory consumes about 20 % of the total power in a typical server platform. This paper describes a novel runtime system that scales the frequency of both processor and DRAM-based on the performance and power models, also proposed here. Specifically, first, a performance-loss constraint is chosen for an application, then, an optimal processor-DRAM frequency pair is modeled such that the pair minimizes the energy consumption in a given timeslice. Experiments performed on SPEC CPU (TM) 2006, NAS NPB, and pARMS benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed runtime system may obtain total energy savings both for memory- and compute-intensive applications. In particular, as much as 22 % of energy was saved with a low performance loss of about 4.8 %.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available