4.5 Article

Fabric analysis of quartzites with negative magnetic susceptibility - Does AMS provide information of SPO or CPO of quartz?

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 48-59

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2015.11.005

Keywords

Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility; Shape preferred orientation; Crystallographic preferred orientation; Quartzite

Funding

  1. Institute Research Fellowship of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We ask the question whether petrofabric data from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) analysis of deformed quartzites gives information about shape preferred orientation (SPO) or crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) of quartz. Since quartz is diamagnetic and has a negative magnetic susceptibility, 11 samples of nearly pure quartzites with a negative magnetic susceptibility were chosen for this study. After performing AMS analysis, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis was done in thin sections prepared parallel to the K1K3 plane of the AMS ellipsoid. Results show that in all the samples quartz SPO is sub-parallel to the orientation of the magnetic foliation. However, in most samples no clear correspondance is observed between quartz CPO and K-1 (magnetic lineation) direction. This is contrary to the parallelism observed between K-1 direction and orientation of quartz c-axis in the case of undeformed single quartz crystal. Pole figures of quartz indicate that quartz c-axis tends to be parallel to K-1 direction only in the case where intracrystalline deformation of quartz is accommodated by prism < c > slip. It is therefore established that AMS investigation of quartz from deformed rocks gives information of SPO. Thus, it is concluded that petrofabric information of quartzite obtained from AMS is a manifestation of its shape anisotropy and not crystallographic preferred orientation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available