4.2 Article

Decompressive Craniectomy for Ischemic Stroke: Effect of Hemorrhagic Transformation on Outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 2177-2183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.12.039

Keywords

Malignant middle cerebral artery stroke; decompressive craniectomy; hemorrhagic transformation; microbleeds; intracerebral hemorrhage; reperfusion injury; intracranial pressure monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DhC) is a life-saving surgical procedure being increasingly employed for malignant middle cerebral artery strokes. We examined the incidence of hemorrhagic transformation following DhC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiological images of patients who underwent DhC for malignant middle cerebral artery strokes. We classified the hemorrhagic events and assessed the short-term 30-day outcome associated with these events. Results: A total of 23 DhCs were performed for supratentorial ischemic strokes in 22 patients. There were 16 males and 6 females with an average age of 47 years (21-69 years). Of the 22 patients, 13 (59%) developed a new hemorrhage following DhC. There were 3 mortalities (14%). Of the survivors, 6 (27%) were discharged home with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 2. The remaining 13 patients (59%) recovered to a degree wherein they were discharged to a rehabilitation center (mRS score 3-4). No patient persisted in a vegetative or semivegetative state (mRS score 5). Conclusions: In this study, the rate of hemorrhagic transformation following DhC for ischemic stroke was 59%. This is much higher than that reported in the stroke thrombolysis literature. The presence of any type of new hemorrhagic transformation in this patient population does not appear to alter the natural history of their ischemic strokes in terms of Glasgow outcome scores or destination of disposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available