4.3 Article

Quantifying universities' direct and indirect carbon emissions - the case of Delft University of Technology

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2022-0121

Keywords

University carbon footprint; Scope 3 emissions; Procurement emissions; Carbon neutrality; GHG accounting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint of Delft University of Technology, identifying emission hotspots and emphasizing the need to reduce supply chain emissions.
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint of the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), including direct and indirect emissions from utilities, logistics and purchases, as well as a discussion about the commonly used method. Emissions are presented in three scopes (scope 1 reports direct process emissions, scope 2 reports emissions from purchased energy and scope 3 reports indirect emissions from the value chain) to identify carbon emission hotspots within the university's operations. Design/methodology/approachThe carbon footprint was calculated using physical and monetary activity data, applying a process and economic input-output analysis. FindingsTU Delft's total carbon footprint in 2018 is calculated at 106 ktCO(2)eq. About 80% are indirect (scope 3) emissions, which is in line with other studies. Emissions from Real estate and construction, Natural gas, Equipment, ICT and Facility services accounted for about 64% of the total footprint, whereas Electricity, Water and waste-related carbon emissions were negligible. These findings highlight the need to reduce universities' supply chain emissions. Originality/valueA better understanding of carbon footprint hotspots can facilitate strategies to reduce emissions and finally achieve carbon neutrality. In contrast to other work, it is argued that using economic input-output models to calculate universities' carbon footprints is a questionable practice, as they can provide only an initial estimation. Therefore, the development of better-suited methods is called for.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available