4.2 Article

When and why people perform mindless math

Journal

JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1208-1228

Publisher

SOC JUDGMENT & DECISION MAKING
DOI: 10.1017/S1930297500009396

Keywords

mindless math; problem solving; dual-process theory; intuitive errors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study shows that the presence of numbers in a problem can tempt people to perform unnecessary mathematical operations, even when the correct answer does not require any math. The findings suggest that increasing the numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math and fewer correct answers. The effect is not due to people being cautious of seemingly easy problems, and it is robust across a wider range of numeric demands.
In this paper, we show that the presence of numbers in a problem tempts people to perform mathematical operations even when the correct answer requires no math, which we term mindless math. In three pre-registered studies across two survey platforms (total N = 3,193), we investigate how mindless math relates to perceived problem difficulty, problem representation, and accuracy. In Study 1, we show that increasing the numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math (and fewer correct answers). Study 2 shows that this effect is not caused by people being wary of problems that seem too easy. In Study 3, we show that this effect is robust over a wider range of numeric demands, and in the discussion we offer two possible mechanisms that would explain this effect, and the caveat that at even harder levels of numeric demands the effect may invert such that much harder math increases accuracy relative to moderately hard math.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Psychology, Experimental

Of Pandemics, Politics, and Personality: The Role of Conscientiousness and Political Ideology in the Sharing of Fake News

M. Asher Lawson, Hemant Kakkar

Summary: Sharing misinformation can have catastrophic consequences, with low conscientiousness conservatives being more likely to spread fake news. Fact-checker interventions are inadequate in preventing the spread of misinformation.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2022)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language

M. Asher Lawson, Ashley E. Martin, Imrul Huda, Sandra C. Matz

Summary: Women are underrepresented in leadership positions due to gender stereotypes. However, appointing women to top management roles can change the language used by organizations and associate women with leadership traits. Increasing female representation might help women overcome gender stereotypes without sacrificing communal characteristics.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Tribalism and Tribulations: The Social Costs of Not Sharing Fake News

M. Asher Lawson, Shikhar Anand, Hemant Kakkar

Summary: Fake news has negative impacts on political polarization and social cohesion. This research reveals that group members who do not conform to sharing fake news experience reduced social interaction, highlighting the importance of conformity pressure in the spread of misinformation.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Comparing fast thinking and slow thinking: The relative benefits of interventions, individual differences, and inferential rules

M. Asher Lawson, Richard P. Larrick, Jack B. Soll

JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING (2020)

No Data Available