4.1 Article

No general pathological significance of aphantasia: An evaluation based on criteria for mental disorders

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 314-324

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12887

Keywords

Aphantasia; mental imagery; mental disorder; mental health; distress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigates whether aphantasia meets the criteria for mental disorders. The prevalence of aphantasia was estimated to be 3.5% to 4.8%. Although aphantasia is statistically rare, it does not have enough impact on daily activities and personal distress to be classified as a mental disorder. However, a subgroup of aphantasia sufferers may experience clinically relevant levels of distress.
As awareness of the phenomenon of aphantasia (= lack of voluntary imagery) has increased in recent years, many psychotherapists ponder its clinical implications. The present study investigates whether aphantasia meets the criteria for mental disorders, i.e. statistical rarity, impairment in activities of daily living, violation of social norms and inappropriate behavior and personal distress. Prevalence of aphantasia was determined meta-analytically based on 3,543 participants. An international sample of 156 participants with aphantasia (58.3% male; M-age = 35.23) and 131 controls (65.6% male; M-age = 28.88) was assessed with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Everyday Memory Performance and the Aphantasia Distress Questionnaire, as well as measures of depression, anxiety and well-being. The prevalence of aphantasia was estimated at 3.5 to 4.8%. Participants with aphantasia scored significantly lower than controls on every day and autobiographical memory, but not on theory of mind. A subgroup of 34.7% of participants with aphantasia reported distress significantly associated with lower well-being and high levels of anxiety and depression. The level of distress increased with poorer performance in autobiographical memory and theory of mind. Although aphantasia meets the criterion of statistical rarity, the impact on activities of daily living and personal distress is too weak to justify a classification as a mental disorder. In a subgroup, however, distress can reach clinically relevant levels. In individual cases, it is therefore advisable to conduct a psychological assessment, for example by means of the Aphantasia Distress Questionnaire.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available