4.5 Article

DOPAMINE-INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF COMBINING TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION WITH CUED GAIT TRAINING ON CORTICAL EXCITABILITY AND FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 9, Pages 819-823

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2134

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation; cued gait training; cortical excitability; functional mobility; Parkinson's disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the dopamine-dependent effect of combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with visually cued gait training on cortical excitability and functional mobility in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Design: A pilot, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Methods: Twenty-two patients with Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned to 2 groups: (1) active anodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area (experimental group), or (ii) sham tDCS (control group). After tDCS, both groups participated in a visually cued gait training. Functional mobility was evaluated with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Cortical excitability was assessed by active motor threshold and motor-evoked potential amplitudes elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients in on and off medication states. Results: In the TUG test both groups achieved improvements either in on or off medication condition compared with baseline. However, for both medication conditions, these gains were maintained only in the experimental group during 1-month follow-up, compared with baseline. In the experimental group, enhancement of cortical excitability was observed at post-intervention and 1-month follow-up (both only for the on phase) compared with baseline. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tDCS, independent of dopaminergic medication state, might prolong the positive effect induced by cued gait training on functional mobility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available